Wiki-surgery? Internal validity of Wikipedia as a medical and surgical reference
|Wiki-surgery? Internal validity of Wikipedia as a medical and surgical reference|
|Authors:||Lara Devgan, Neil Powe, Brittony Blakey, Martin Makary|
|Citation:||Journal of the American College of Surgeons missing volume (3): S76-S77. 2007 September|
|Database(s):||Google Scholar cites|
|Web:||Bing Google Yahoo! — Google PDF|
|Article:||BASE Google Scholar PubMed|
|Restricted:||DTU Digital Library|
Wiki-surgery? Internal validity of Wikipedia as a medical and surgical reference is an abstract about "the most commonly performed inpatient procedures in the U.S." on Wikipedia: the quality of its content in terms of comprehensiveness and reliability.
Two indepedent reviewers evalutated 39 procedures. 35 were indexed by Wikipedia and 30 of them were deemed appropriate. All presented accurate information, but only 22 had no critical omissions. Risk were only discussed in 22 cases, while procedure indications in 34.
There was correlation between quality of Wikipedia articles and how often it was edited.
 Related papers
- Does Wikipedia provide evidence-based health care information? A content analysis
- How to measure the quality of surgery-related web sites
- Patient-oriented cancer information on the Internet: a comparison of Wikipedia and a professionally maintained database
- Scope, completeness, and accuracy of drug information in Wikipedia
- What is the quality of surgery-related information on the internet? Lessons learned from a standardized evaluation of 10 common operations
- Wikipedia and osteosarcoma: a trustworthy patients' information?