Scope, completeness, and accuracy of drug information in Wikipedia
|Scope, completeness, and accuracy of drug information in Wikipedia|
|Authors:||Kevin A. Clauson, Hyla H. Polen, Maged N. Kamel Boulos, Joan H. Dzenowagis|
|Citation:||The Annals of pharmacotherapy 42 (12): 1814-1811. 2008 December|
|Web:||Bing Google Yahoo! — Google PDF|
|Article:||BASE Google Scholar PubMed|
|Restricted:||DTU Digital Library|
|Format:||BibTeX Template from PMID|
|Extract:||Talairach coordinates from linked PDF: CSV-formated wiki-formated|
Scope, completeness, and accuracy of drug information in Wikipedia reports a study on drug information in Wikipedia and compared it with Medscape Drug Reference.
Wikipedia had more omissions but no factual errors among 80 drug-related questions/answers, e.g., for administration, contraindications and issues around pregnancy/lactation. They also find that Wikipedia has no dosage information, but this is not surprising given that Wikipedia explicit encourage authors not to add this information. Four factual errors were found in Medscape. Two were conflicting information in different parts of the text while the remaining two were due to lack of timely update.
 Related papers
- Patient-oriented cancer information on the Internet: a comparison of Wikipedia and a professionally maintained database
- Wikipedia and osteosarcoma: a trustworthy patients' information?
- It is not entirely clear who did and how the answers to the constructed questions, e.g., where the blinded or was that not important because the answers were obvious to evaluate?